So, this happened (finally! I have always, always, always dreamed of going to Istanbul).
Friday, January 30, 2015
Sunday, January 4, 2015
Think of all the things/ We've shared and seen/ Don't think about the things/ Which might have been
Happy 2015! Or something. I'm actually in a really bad mood due to a significant back injury (my last few days were supposed to include flying, German wheel, dance trapeze, and flying, and they include a bit of dance trapeze and a lot of bed rest). I'm potentially willing to forgive 2015 if it shapes up immediately. Right now it is on serious probation.
But, let's not forget 2014. So, how did we do?
Well, not terribly, I guess, though also not well, exactly. Once again we hit exactly 100 books. The depressing part of that is I made that about a week before the end of the year, but then rather than reading more books and getting a bit ahead, instead I read a game theory book and some super frivolous non-fiction. Le sigh.
Admittedly, 100 books is not bad (and again, I read more books than that over the year, that's the list books). It's my goal for the year after all, and I should be pleased about meeting the goal. Or something. I think that the issue here is that for awhile I was doing so much better than just meeting the base goal. 2012 I hit 100 in October and then kept going. That's definitely the year I've read the most
That said, man, 2012 was a really rough year for me. 2014 wasn't a great list year, but it was one of my best years. I'm not sure if there is an inverse correlation here, but it's not exactly unrelated, I don't think.
But, let's not forget 2014. So, how did we do?
Well, not terribly, I guess, though also not well, exactly. Once again we hit exactly 100 books. The depressing part of that is I made that about a week before the end of the year, but then rather than reading more books and getting a bit ahead, instead I read a game theory book and some super frivolous non-fiction. Le sigh.
Admittedly, 100 books is not bad (and again, I read more books than that over the year, that's the list books). It's my goal for the year after all, and I should be pleased about meeting the goal. Or something. I think that the issue here is that for awhile I was doing so much better than just meeting the base goal. 2012 I hit 100 in October and then kept going. That's definitely the year I've read the most
That said, man, 2012 was a really rough year for me. 2014 wasn't a great list year, but it was one of my best years. I'm not sure if there is an inverse correlation here, but it's not exactly unrelated, I don't think.
Monday, December 22, 2014
So it's gonna be forever/ Or it's gonna go down in flames/ You can tell me when it's over/ If the high was worth the pain
Some random thoughts that I've had this month on the march to the end (I'm at book 99 for the year, 637 for the project, if you are wondering):
Joseph Conrad is vanquished!
What kind of idiot chooses Pynchon's Gravity's Rainbow when trying to read nine books in December?
I really do not understand why Anne Shirley ignored geometry for Ben-Hur. And I say this as someone who's not a fan of geometry (number theory any day).
Does it really matter if I don't read 100 books this year? What am I saying, of course it does; my life will more or less be a complete failure if I don't.
Why are so many books about horribly irritating people making horrible life choices? Money, I'm looking at you.
Joseph Conrad is vanquished!
What kind of idiot chooses Pynchon's Gravity's Rainbow when trying to read nine books in December?
I really do not understand why Anne Shirley ignored geometry for Ben-Hur. And I say this as someone who's not a fan of geometry (number theory any day).
Does it really matter if I don't read 100 books this year? What am I saying, of course it does; my life will more or less be a complete failure if I don't.
Why are so many books about horribly irritating people making horrible life choices? Money, I'm looking at you.
Sunday, November 30, 2014
I was content/ A princess asleep and enchanted/ If I had dreams/ Then I let you dream them for me
All right, folks, let's take stock of November! At first I was afraid that I'd have to write about how this was a failure of a month. Largely because of my South Korea venture, I had a pretty hectic month. And to be honest, my regular life doesn't really lend itself to the project to begin with. Yes, I the trip involved some long flights (the two longest flights of my life, actually), but a few things conspired against those flights being productive:
- I tried to sleep as much as I could, and I'm a pretty good sleeper.
- My return flight had wifi. Amazing.
- I binged Serial.
- In addition to the New Yorker, I generally indulged in non-fiction (I even bought the Lena Dunham book).
Tuesday, November 25, 2014
Even if everything else turns to dirt/ You'll be the one thing in this world that won't hurt
And now, a dialogue:
Me: Reading 100 books a year is hard; I don't think you appreciate how hard.
Josh: Oh, I appreciate it. I just don't understand why you want to do it.
Me: I just want to be done.
Josh: Maybe you should take a break. God wants you to take a sabbatical.
Me: Questioning look.
Josh: In the Sinaitic Covenant God made the Jews take a sabbatical every seven years where they had to stop tending their crops and let their fields fallow.
Me: Well, I've not been doing this for seven years; I should take a break when I'm 29.
Josh: That doesn't matter. It's not like you're Jewish or anything.
Me: But then why should I take a break?
Josh: Because God wants you to.
Me: Reading 100 books a year is hard; I don't think you appreciate how hard.
Josh: Oh, I appreciate it. I just don't understand why you want to do it.
Me: I just want to be done.
Josh: Maybe you should take a break. God wants you to take a sabbatical.
Me: Questioning look.
Josh: In the Sinaitic Covenant God made the Jews take a sabbatical every seven years where they had to stop tending their crops and let their fields fallow.
Me: Well, I've not been doing this for seven years; I should take a break when I'm 29.
Josh: That doesn't matter. It's not like you're Jewish or anything.
Me: But then why should I take a break?
Josh: Because God wants you to.
Sunday, November 23, 2014
And you know that it's just a sonata away/ And you play/ And you play/ And Everything else goes away
I read many great books as a child: The Betsy series, The Austin Family series, The Chronicles of Prydain, The Enchanted Forest series, Little Women, Secret Garden, Jane Eyre, Diamond in the Window, Song of the Lioness Quartet, Princess and the Goblins, the Narnia books, Lord of the Rings, virtually everything by E. Nesbit, Anne of Green Gables, Little House series, Sherlock Holmes, Baby Island, the Oz books, Wise Child and Juniper, Catherine Called Birdie, Tattooed Potato, etc., etc., etc. We were an intensely book family.
I also read a number of not so good books. Most of these were mass-produced series and extremely formulaic. I can recognize now (and to some extent I did then, too) how bad these really are, but I still remember them with a bit of nostalgia.
Saddle Club: truly epic. This is the story of three privileged friends who live in Virginia and ride horses. They eventually come to own their own horses in most cases, they travel to exotic horse-related places, ride competitively, outsmart kidnappers, save horses from a forest fire (maybe? my memory is not great), and hand out a lot of soda. Lisa, or "Mary Sue" gets movie stars, handsome Italian men,"bad boy" ranch hands, and almost anything with a pulse to crush on her (she is like 11 or 12). Sarah and I still play a game where we try to name as many of these in order as we can; there were like 100 of them.
Nancy Drew: I didn't even really get into the original books, but I did read a lot of the later era ones, like one where Nancy and co. go to Arizona or New Mexico or something to solve a crime or where they have to join the Renaissance Festival as performers to ferret out something or other (these were really memorable). Later in my life I read this amazing book that analyzes Nancy Drew from a Jungian perspective; it is beyond description and I will gladly loan it to anyone.
Boxcar Children: So, I stand by the first few in this series when they were actually written by Gertrude Chandler Warner; they weren't so formulaic. But later they started to be extremely formulaic, and also much shorter. Basically Henry, Jess, Violet, and Benny solve some mystery, usually while traveling. You can see why I loved these books, since traveling and mysteries were/are two of my favorite things. Still, you can never get back the hours you spent reading these.
Happy Hollisters: I have such a fondness for these books. My father had them all growing up, and we read from his collection of these books, each one crimson with a black silhouette of Hollister children (let's see if I can remember them: Pete, Pam, Holly, Ricky, and Sue; man the brain space). These were also mystery books. My absolute favorite was the cuckoo clock one where they go to Germany; we lived in Germany for a bit when I was young, and we read this book many times while in Germany. I'm sure reading these outloud got old for my parents, though; they are a very, very, very happy family.
I could keep going (Girlhood Journeys, Magic Attic, Dear America, Sweet Valley Twins, Cam Jansen, etc.), but I think tat I'll stop.
I also read a number of not so good books. Most of these were mass-produced series and extremely formulaic. I can recognize now (and to some extent I did then, too) how bad these really are, but I still remember them with a bit of nostalgia.
Saddle Club: truly epic. This is the story of three privileged friends who live in Virginia and ride horses. They eventually come to own their own horses in most cases, they travel to exotic horse-related places, ride competitively, outsmart kidnappers, save horses from a forest fire (maybe? my memory is not great), and hand out a lot of soda. Lisa, or "Mary Sue" gets movie stars, handsome Italian men,"bad boy" ranch hands, and almost anything with a pulse to crush on her (she is like 11 or 12). Sarah and I still play a game where we try to name as many of these in order as we can; there were like 100 of them.
Nancy Drew: I didn't even really get into the original books, but I did read a lot of the later era ones, like one where Nancy and co. go to Arizona or New Mexico or something to solve a crime or where they have to join the Renaissance Festival as performers to ferret out something or other (these were really memorable). Later in my life I read this amazing book that analyzes Nancy Drew from a Jungian perspective; it is beyond description and I will gladly loan it to anyone.
Boxcar Children: So, I stand by the first few in this series when they were actually written by Gertrude Chandler Warner; they weren't so formulaic. But later they started to be extremely formulaic, and also much shorter. Basically Henry, Jess, Violet, and Benny solve some mystery, usually while traveling. You can see why I loved these books, since traveling and mysteries were/are two of my favorite things. Still, you can never get back the hours you spent reading these.
Happy Hollisters: I have such a fondness for these books. My father had them all growing up, and we read from his collection of these books, each one crimson with a black silhouette of Hollister children (let's see if I can remember them: Pete, Pam, Holly, Ricky, and Sue; man the brain space). These were also mystery books. My absolute favorite was the cuckoo clock one where they go to Germany; we lived in Germany for a bit when I was young, and we read this book many times while in Germany. I'm sure reading these outloud got old for my parents, though; they are a very, very, very happy family.
I could keep going (Girlhood Journeys, Magic Attic, Dear America, Sweet Valley Twins, Cam Jansen, etc.), but I think tat I'll stop.
Tuesday, November 18, 2014
Why is it you still believe?/ Do you dream or do you grieve?/ You've got to let him go
So, as I recently mentioned, Drew is reading one of the list books out loud to me, specifically Perfume. This got me to thinking, does it count if you don't actually read the book but hear the book? One hand, why not? Other hand, well, you're not actually reading it.
It's a conundrum. My immediate reaction is that no, of course it should count. But the more I think about it the more I realize that I can't exactly back that reaction up, though, with any sort of logical argument. However, I tend to just descend further into the existential. After all, what does it mean, really, to read a book? What is the essence of reading?
While I try to figure that out, here are some other book that were read to me that are on the list:
It's a conundrum. My immediate reaction is that no, of course it should count. But the more I think about it the more I realize that I can't exactly back that reaction up, though, with any sort of logical argument. However, I tend to just descend further into the existential. After all, what does it mean, really, to read a book? What is the essence of reading?
While I try to figure that out, here are some other book that were read to me that are on the list:
- To Kill a Mockingbird
- The Lord of the Rings
- The Hobbit
- Treasure Island
- The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes
- Through the Looking Glass
- Alice's Adventures in Wonderland
- The 13 Clocks
Thursday, November 13, 2014
One light shines in the drive/ One single sign/ That our house is alive/ Our house, our own/So why do I/ Live there alone?
I think of life in terms of opportunity costs. Moreover, I get really irritated by people who don't (sure, this may not be a waste of time per se, but compared to everything else we could be doing at this moment, it is a waste of time). So, let's calculate some list opportunity costs.
There are 1001 books on the list. That's about 348,629 pages or 104,588,700words (~300 words a page); that should take about 582 hours to read (rate calculated using this site's estimations). So far I have read 624 books on the list (is that a lot? it feels like it should be more? Lord, I'll never be done with this project). So that means ~363 hours of reading. Right? Someone check my math. Also, does that gut check for you? I have no idea.
Let's assume it's correct. Here are some other things I could have been doing during that time:
There are 1001 books on the list. That's about 348,629 pages or 104,588,700words (~300 words a page); that should take about 582 hours to read (rate calculated using this site's estimations). So far I have read 624 books on the list (is that a lot? it feels like it should be more? Lord, I'll never be done with this project). So that means ~363 hours of reading. Right? Someone check my math. Also, does that gut check for you? I have no idea.
Let's assume it's correct. Here are some other things I could have been doing during that time:
- 181.5 flying trapeze classes
- 363 static trapeze classes
- 9 Rosetta Stone language levels
- 484 spin classes
- 24 scarves knitted
- 871 Focus T25 workouts
- 2.5 drives around the world (if there was a road that went around the earth's diameter and I drove continuously at 55mph)
- 653,400 pushups
- 77.5 marathons (if I'm the median woman)
- An indeterminate non-zero number of Suzuki method violin books completed (I could not find a helpful estimate of time anywhere, but man are parents worried that their 3 and 4 year olds aren't progressing quickly enough).
It slits my skin, and trips my brain/ And feel the burn, when I don't feel the pain
In the continuing saga of Mint.com: I remain the worlds' most passive Mint user; I never log in (I still haven't remember my password), and I never categorize my expenses (rent shows up as "check"). I just glance at the emails they send me and get anxious.
Recently Mint helpfully informed me that I spent an unusual amount on "travel." Color me surprised, Mint. Mint also tells me every time I pay an ATM fee and cheerily keeps a running total for my fees for the year.
Mint, my darling, I get reimbursed for ATM fees by PNC. Actually, that's one of the two things that I love about my bank.
The other thing that I love is that if you go to a PNC ATM you can take out bills in any amount. I like to get $37; that way I get a $20, a $10, a $5 and two $1s. I realize that I could take out $36 and get a similar experience, but I prefer odd numbers.
Recently Mint helpfully informed me that I spent an unusual amount on "travel." Color me surprised, Mint. Mint also tells me every time I pay an ATM fee and cheerily keeps a running total for my fees for the year.
Mint, my darling, I get reimbursed for ATM fees by PNC. Actually, that's one of the two things that I love about my bank.
The other thing that I love is that if you go to a PNC ATM you can take out bills in any amount. I like to get $37; that way I get a $20, a $10, a $5 and two $1s. I realize that I could take out $36 and get a similar experience, but I prefer odd numbers.
Monday, November 10, 2014
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)